France can do it, just don't say 'dark horses', writes Ian Borthwick
The French language has no equivalent for the expression "dark horse". Which is probably just as well, as it would no doubt have become one of those tiresome cliches that we scribblers trot out every four years when Rugby World Cup comes around.
For Anglophones, however, it is a handy label when trying to pigeon-hole these French roosters. Given the bewildering variations in les Bleus' performance over the past few seasons, you never know what to expect. They were trounced 59-10 by Australia in Paris last November, and tumbled to an all-time low against Italy in this year's Six Nations, losing 22-21 in Rome. On the other hand, they beat the All Blacks in Dunedin in 2009, they won a Six Nations Grand Slam in 2010, and France is still the only Northern nation to have won a series in New Zealand (2-0 in 1994).
While their erratic results over the past two years leave much to be desired, the two build-up games against Ireland had a promising look. And history has shown they have a nasty tendency to produce major upsets at le Mondial. Sydney 1987, Twickenham 1999, Cardiff 2007... in World Cup lore, these are synonymous with France's uncanny ability to upset the apple-cart by taking out the tournament favourites.
It is difficult trying to identify the type of game Thierry Dusautoir and his men are attempting to play. At the core of the problem is the domestic competition and the priority given to the French clubs, at the expense of the national XV. The Top 14 may well be regarded as the premium club competition in world rugby, at least when you consider the list of big-name international players who make the move to France every year. Paradoxically, however, the Top 14 has evolved into a competition where teams play not so much to win, but to avoid defeat.