There is a standard shot that seemingly must be included in most sports broadcasts. The one where the camera will pan and show us someone of note watching the game. At the US Open, there was a cast of A-List celebrities. At women’s fixtures, it can be a handful of
Alice Soper: Mixing politics and sport the right proper way
The British Royal are selective about their bandwagons. Controversially opting not to travel to support the England women in either their rugby or football World Cup final, they have been sideline at the men’s Rugby World Cup. This year, the competition has no less than 11 members of the Commonwealth competing. Six of which Prince William and Princess Kate may one day preside over as Head of State. All this means they have skin in almost every game.
Here, once again, we see politics shine through their fandom. The King and Queen in waiting, opting to cheer on England and Wales never mind the rest of their subjects. In order to successfully execute sports diplomacy, they really ought to be a little more diplomatic. Or perhaps Prince William could take a leaf out of his disgraced brother’s book and find a sport for which he has a more natural connection. Prince Harry’s involvement in the Invictus Games has been proven more mutually beneficial.
There’s the rub. If you are to take up the mantle of a fan, you need to be an authentic champion for your sport. In the politicians’ case, this means sound sports policy must follow their expressed interest. If you love the game, tell me what your party is going to do to help grow it. If you love the players, tell me how your platform will contribute to their success.
A month out from another general election, I have one request for the politicians popping up on the sidelines. Please, show me less of your team colours and more of your team’s policies for the sports we both love.