Australian rugby is not in a great place. Robbie Deans is not in a great place. Perhaps the two need a break from each other - a voluntary or forced separation.
Failure in the Rugby Championship should spell the end of Deans' Wallaby venture. There would be little gained from persevering with something that so obviously isn't working. The Wallabies have won only 60 per cent of their tests under Deans - which is not so much a 'could do better' record, more of a 'someone else could do better' record.
After four-and-a-half years in charge, what reason is there to believe Deans will make a sudden breakthrough? There's no way of ever really knowing these things but the gut feel within the Australian Rugby Union should be leaning them towards thinking that Ewen McKenzie is a better bet.
If nothing else, McKenzie is Australian and knows how to coach Australian players. The notion that the Kiwi way can be transplanted all over the world is not quite true. David Pocock is not Richie McCaw; Quade Cooper is not Dan Carter and there is a feeling that while Deans has worked that out, he hasn't been able to adjust his coaching to reflect the cultural, tactical and psychological differences.
What felt like a coup d'etat back in late 2007 now feels like a worthy gamble that hasn't paid off. Those ever canny Australians had observed the All Black coaching appointment process with their arms outstretched, ready to envelop Deans and offer him the international job his own country wouldn't. ARU chief executive John O'Neill talked immediately of how the appointment of Deans would lead a Wallaby renaissance. The goal of winning 75 per cent of their tests was set and Deans was tasked with restoring the credibility of Australian rugby.