The mantra at next year's World Cup is shaping to be 'a good game is a quick game' amid concerns a global audience will lose interest if there are endless referrals to video officials.
The experiment of allowing referees to review the two previous phases before a try was scored has not been a roaring success in Super Rugby. The pervading view is too many games are taking too long and the essence of what the rules were designed for has been lost.
The rationale for increasing the powers of the television match official was to provide the referee with a means to seek clarification if he felt there was a clear and obvious infringement in the immediate build-up. Likewise, the rules were extended to include reviews of foul play but, again, the intention was more about providing evidence of the severity rather than to try to determine whether it happened.
Speaking in London last week to mark 500 days until the World Cup, IRB chief executive Brett Gosper hinted at the need for the game to strike a better balance at next year's tournament.
The officiating has to be accurate, but also decisive was the sub-text. Technology can't be used to discover what the eye didn't initially see. No one wants the complexities of rugby to become its greatest weakness with TMOs asked to peer at footage to find a stray hand doing something it shouldn't have.