The fallout from the Pilkington Review into New Zealand Rugby’s (NZR) governance structure has taken another turn, with NZR’s Pasifika Advisory Group (NZRPAG) throwing support behind an alternate proposal by the provincial unions.
Despite agreeing with the findings of the review published in August last year - a 134-page independent report that found the current governance structure was not fit for purpose and recommended implementing a new system that would produce nine independent directors to sit on the board of the national body - seven months of negotiations between NZR and the unions have failed to produce a unanimous agreement that this is the best way forward.
NZR chair Dame Patsy Reddy has, therefore, opted to present unions with a choice of voting for the most radical governance change in the game’s history - one that will lessen their power and influence in favour of full independence - or to green-light a less dramatic change that will preserve the unions’ status as the key decision-makers in the national game.
In a statement, NZRPAG said they were formally endorsing the provincial unions’ proposal that seeks to maintain three board representatives with at least two years’ experience on a provincial board.
“The NZ Rugby Pasifika Advisory Group - Tausoa Fa’atasi is formally supporting and endorsing the new Governance Proposal to be put forward by representatives of NZ Rugby’s provincial unions in response to the NZR Governance Review.