Do sports awards feed from each other and feel they should reflect winners in similar ceremonies?
Nominations for the Laureus Awards next month have delivered the All Blacks into the team section and Daniel Carter into the section for 2015 comeback of the year after their World Cup success.
How do they measure his revival and from what - poor form or struggles?
Have Laureus joined populist commentaries and picked Carter because he won the World Rugby award for the third time as player of the year after the All Blacks repeated their World Cup triumph?
Both results were a neat signoff to Carter's international career after he worked his way steadily into form and confidence in the pool games and then drove lynchpin performances in the latter stages of the tournament.