As it currently stands, it is at the referee’s discretion how much of an advantage is allowed before either signalling advantage over or recalling play for the penalty.
The officiating of the Twickenham match, in particular, drew criticism from many for Matthew Carley’s letter-of-the-law approach to his whistle-blowing.
Fitzpatrick pointed out to Deaker that the majority of decisions by Carley were correct, yet hamper the spectacle of the game as it results in a stop-start affair (the first half of that test alone took over an hour).
“He refereed to the letter of the law and 99 per cent of those were penalties, but he didn’t have a feel for the game and it took a lot out of it.”
He agreed with Deaker referees could dominate this World Cup - but said it’s largely out of their hands as they are constrained by the laws of the game.
“I think they could, but not through their fault. It’s because of the laws. We’ve got some very good referees at the moment but they’re hamstrung by the laws and what they’re told to do.”
Red cards have been another point of contention - brought to a head after World Rugby appealed against the initial decision to overturn Owen Farrell’s red card he received against Wales in August.
Fitzpatrick says he is a fan of the ‘bunker’ system - in which television match officials have the ability to review cards and either upgrade or maintain the current level - but told Deaker having World Rugby intervene has him concerned.
“I’m a little bit concerned about the consistency and that’s what we need to make sure that’s right... hopefully the referees and World Rugby will stick to what they’re saying they’re going to do.”
Will Toogood is an Online Sports Editor for the NZ Herald. He has previously worked for Newstalk ZB’s digital team and at Waiheke’s Gulf News covering sport and events.