You bombard them with your intentions, your dreams and your plan to achieve them - which includes them at the helm. Remember, these people must fit the vision of the club. To be the best, you must entice the best.
At present, I cannot see Bennett accepting this job, even if one of the Warriors owners, in particular Owen Glenn, was to throw money at him. That would become a war between himself and Newcastle Knights owner and multi-millionaire Nathan Tinkler. It would be an ego-driven affair, fighting for the title of who has the biggest pockets. No one wins that fight. Bennett is in the first year of a four-five year deal and will honour that arrangement.
Hasler is at a good club. Why would he leave the Bulldogs sitting at the top of the table?
That leaves Bellamy, who has one year left on his deal and would, at present, be top of the list for the Warriors. He fits the vision of the club and would drive a large part of it and is capable of meeting and even surpassing the goals. The only stumbling block would be his tenure at Melbourne with a year left on his contract.
Would he seek a release from it? My early suspicion is that, like Bennett, he is a values-based person and would also honour his contract. Bellamy would be welcomed in New Zealand and would instil a work ethic foreign to most players in the NRL. His drive, determination and desire is evident in his speech and his record speaks for itself; he is desperately needed and is the man for this role.
Other coaches do not fill the criteria but there is no doubting their abilities. Tim Sheens, Brian Smith and Steve Folkes are suggested names along with others and warrant consideration - but only after the above mentioned decline the offer.
Rookie coaches, failed coaches and similar need not apply. The rookie coach can be appointed to hang off the coat tails of the master and learn - and know that, in time, he will inherit the position.