Warriors under-20s player James Bell, recently banned for three games after being found guilty of spitting blood at an opponent, unwittingly hit on a broader issue that puzzles many on the sidelines - why do players spit on the field?
Bell's ban suggests the NRL judiciary didn't totally buy his contention that it was accidental, although there is the unspoken mitigation he might not have known he had blood in his mouth at the time. Plenty of players cop a bang in the mouth that produces a bit of claret, which usually clears reasonably quickly. You can't always judge it by taste, as running at pace around a rugby, league or football field often produces a thick taste in the mouth anyway.
So why do players spit? Over a long rugby career, I can remember producing a few mouth missiles but I wasn't a big spitter.
If you believe the biological explanation, exertion like that in all football codes can produce some nasty build-up in the mouth which either has to be swallowed or expelled. But if that was the only explanation, why don't tennis players, basketballers, female hockey players, netballers and those playing many other sports which require a large degree of physical exertion also spit? You don't see Roger Federer producing oysters at Wimbledon, do you? Nor Irene van Dyk on the netball court. So it isn't just expulsion by expectoration, then.
I wore a mouthguard playing rugby. That can dry the mouth appallingly, particularly in warm weather. Rinsing and spitting is one (temporary) solution but doesn't last very long. I rubbed petroleum jelly on my mouthguard - probably not very health-giving in its properties but it didn't taste bad and kept the mouth lubricated, requiring only the occasional jettisoning of excess fluid.