It's time for some perspective on the Tui Lolohea situation. It seems to be spinning out of control, mainly driven by Australian pundits and media.
Why the likes of Matthew Johns, Greg Alexander and Braith Anasta - who are just ex-players with an opinion and have no coaching background - are given so much credence on this side of the Tasman is sometimes hard to understand.
It's better to stick to the facts. The Lolohea controversy has been fuelled by two coaching decisions by Andrew McFadden. The first was the late switch ahead of the Sharks game in round 16, with Jonathan Wright coming in ahead of Lolohea. Wright had a poor game, with several glaring errors, but even without those he should never, in any circumstances, be picked ahead of the likes of Lolohea, Ken Maumalo or David Fusitua. McFadden can be cautious and this was a conservative selection that backfired.
The second occurred in Perth last Saturday. There is an argument that Lolohea should have taken the field in the final quarter rather than Jazz Tevaga. Whether he was a straight swap for Manu Vatuvei, or put into the halves, with Thomas Leuluai shifting to loose forward, Lolohea was the kind of player who could have broken that game open.