I can't work out why they didn't pick Luke. The explanations I've heard haven't enlightened me, leaving me wondering if it was for something other than form.
The selectors have been very loyal over the past few years but none of that loyalty was shown to Luke.
It doesn't make sense.
There's no doubt the Kiwis still have a good side when they have all their players available. Any team would have struggled without the likes of Kieran Foran, Simon Mannering, Roger Tuivasa-Sheck, Thomas Leuluai, Shaun Kenny-Dowall and Luke.
The Anzac test illustrated to me the need to develop depth in key positions. The Kiwis won't always have their best players available.
Someone like Kodi Nikorima, for instance, needs to start more regularly for the Broncos so he can learn what's required of a playmaker.
Foran and Johnson have forged a good partnership in the halves but they won't always be there and it's uncertain for how much longer Leuluai will be around.
It's the same at hooker. Without Luke, the Kiwis lack quality options. You need more than a makeshift hooker to beat Australia. Brown is not a first-grade hooker, let alone an international one.
Whether it was the Warriors or Kiwis who made the decision, it was a good call to not consider Manu Vatuvei, Ben Matulino and Bodene Thompson because of their off-field antics. Coach Stephen Kearney made the mistake of picking Sonny Bill Williams for the 2013 World Cup, choosing results over values, and he doesn't want the use of prescription drugs to be a factor again after what happened nearly three years ago.
The game was the first for Mal Meninga as Australia coach and it's clear how he's going to approach the job. He's even more loyal than Kearney, so and I can't see him making many changes ahead of next year's World Cup, even though many, including Phil Gould, are clamouring for some new blood.
He might have a number of players in their mid-30s but many of the ones in this group are the most influential players in the game.
