Lydia Ko reacts to her birdie on the 16th green during the third round of the Palos Verdes Championship. Photo / AP
Last weekend's LPGA event in California will likely be remembered as much for what was said as the golf that was played. Asked about some on-course treatment she'd needed for back pain, world number three Lydia Ko replied matter-of-factly, "It's that time of the month."
The candid reference to her menstrual cycle had Golf Channel commentator Jerry Foltz flummoxed. Ko joked, "I know you're at a loss for words, Jerry. Honesty it is."
Ko has been celebrated for breaking the stigma about menstruation in sport. But she is not the first elite athlete to talk to the topic. Chinese swimmer Fu Yuanhui made headlines for telling the world she was on her period during the 2016 Rio Olympics.
Lydia Ko explaining that her mid-round physical therapy was because it’s “that time of the month.”
But even though more athletes are speaking out about a normal physiological experience, the words "period" and "menstruation" still tend to shock commentators and audiences.
A brief look at the history of women in sport helps explain these longstanding silences and taboos. In fact, women in the 19th century were considered too "weak" and "fragile" to even participate in sport and vigorous physical activity.
Doctors and politicians – male, of course – warned women that running, cycling or playing tennis would compromise their ability to have children, including the threat that women's wombs would fall out if they rode a bicycle.
We might seem to have come a long way, with modern women competing in almost every sport, demonstrating skill, competence, strength and courage. Yet discussion of many aspects of their female physiology – menstruation, menopause, pregnancy – has long been suppressed.
In this context, the menstrual cycle has often been seen as a "problem" in women's sport. Research has revealed how sportswomen view it as an unwanted complication for training and competition. Some athletes have resorted to working around it for big events by manipulating the oral contraceptive.
It has been shown the menstrual cycle not only affects female reproduction, but also regulates physiological, metabolic, thermoregulatory and cognitive functions. But even coaches well versed in sport science have trouble talking about the menstrual cycle.
Our own research has shown most elite sportswomen don't feel comfortable talking about menstrual health matters with male coaches and support staff, preferring to talk to women instead. While some coaches have adopted a more progressive approach, they remain the minority.
With a persistent culture of stigma and taboo, conversations about menstruation often happen in code, or quietly and privately among fellow sportswomen and women support staff.
An evolving science
Over the past two decades, however, a new wave of women in sport science has been leading important initiatives in understanding how the menstrual cycle affects women's training, performance and recovery.
Their research has examined an array of menstrual-health issues faced by sportswomen (and menstruating non-gender-conforming athletes), including conditions such as iron deficiency, menorrhagia (heavy bleeding), amenorrhea (chronic loss of menstruation), and RED-S (relative energy deficiency in sport). The work represents a real change, with more research by women, with women, for women.
Armed with such knowledge, athletes and teams are designing training, performance, recovery, injury prevention and rehabilitation, sleep, nutrition and well-being programmes around the menstrual cycle. In the process, menstruation is re-framed as a sign of health and power.
By better understanding the menstrual cycle, they can work with it rather than against it. But there are still gaps and silences.
For example, much of the research is conducted by white sports scientists on white sportswomen. Important cultural and religious ways of knowing menstruation are ignored or overlooked – although some athletes are drawing on Indigenous understandings of menstruation as a time and source of strength and power.
Lydia Ko has restarted an important conversation, one we must keep having publicly and privately. As physiology and nutrition expert Stacy Sims has put it, "women are not small men", and their distinctive and varied physiologies are not weaknesses. Rather, they are strengths yet to be fully understood, harnessed and celebrated.