A 6-4 loss to Germany yesterday consigned the New Zealand men's hockey team to the minor placings at the Champions Trophy - the second straight tournament in which they have underwhelmed.
The Black Sticks will meet England this morning in a bid to avoid last place which, in the eight-team tournament, would at least be an improvement on the ninth they managed at the Olympics.
The consecutive disappointments can hardly be bundled together, considering the turnover in players and coach since London, but the lowly finishes are a far cry from their fourth place at last year's Champions Trophy in Auckland. That result, New Zealand's best at a Champions Trophy, was followed by success in the Sultan Azlan Shah Cup, an invitational event in which the Black Sticks emerged triumphant from a field containing five of the world's top 10 teams.
So why, with the side in perhaps their best shape since winning gold at the 1976 Olympics, did the Black Sticks disappoint at this year's Games and follow that up by failing to make waves this week in Melbourne? Why have New Zealand been so inconsistent at major tournaments, with notable results almost always followed by apparent regression?
"It's a little bit of a worry, to be honest," said Ramesh Patel, a gold-medallist in Montreal who in 2010 ended 22 years of involvement at Hockey New Zealand. "They've got some good players who do well at a lot of the tournaments - the promise is there - and then they don't quite deliver."