Last night Mr Evans admitted he had been "young and stupid" at the time of the incident.
"I have maintained my innocence from day one, so I can never apologise directly for what happened," he told the Mail On Sunday.
"I think it was a situation that got taken out of our hands from an early stage. She never said anybody raped her. She said she had a blackout but that didn't mean, like it was said in court, that she didn't consent."
The prosecution's case is that girl was unable to consent due to her level of intoxication.
Writing on Chedevans.com, he said: "I absolutely disassociate myself from anyone who names on any forum the woman in this case. Or makes any offensive comments about her.
"Everyone associated with the past five years now has the right to move on with their lives and I wish no ill will to anybody."
In a rare move the court allowed the jury to hear about the girl's sexual past.
Her father said: "It was like she was the one on trial - not the person accused of committing the crime.
"His sexual history wasn't brought up. They might as well have just said my daughter was asking for it. I feel as if there was a rape committed in that court by those lawyers who went through my daughter's sexual history. As a father I felt really sickened."
On Saturday Vera Baird, police and crime commissioner for Northumbria and former solicitor general, said British law had gone back 30 years.
"The only difference between a clear conviction of Mr Evans in 2012 and the absolute refusal of him having any leave to appeal at that time, and his acquittal now, is that he has called some men to throw discredit on [the woman's] sexual reputation," she said.
"That, I think, is pouring prejudice, which is exactly what used to happen before the law in 1999 stopped the admission of previous sexual history in order to show consent.
"We've gone back, I'm afraid, probably about 30 years."
