It took less than a day for the four-test series between Australia and India to be tainted by poor umpiring decisions. The pity is it doesn't have to be this way, or not to the extent we have seen so far at the MCG.
All those wonderful ingredients for a rivalry - controversy, a changing balance of power, star players and a close contest - continue to fuel the battles between ailing Australia and inconsistent India. Their contests now rival the historic Ashes in representing the pinnacle of world cricket.
As controversy goes, though, there was too much of the needless variety on the opening day at Melbourne.
The fault lies firmly with an impotent ICC which, instead of deeming the decision review system (DRS) mandatory, allows teams to veto the use of technology-assisted umpiring decisions. India, a cricket nation dominated by the power of its senior players, prevents technology being used for their matches while the rest of a sport in awe of its financial power allows the Indians to dictate these terms. What a shoddy state of affairs for an international sport and the ICC's ranking system.
The DRS is not perfect and needs developing and fine tuning in both accuracy and implementation, but despite a few faults it is still far more accurate than letting umpires make decisions alone.