New Zealand Cricket need to secure Mike Hesson's coaching and management services while they are available - be it as head coach, general manager or as part of a wider team.
NZC cannot repeat July's mistake when the former Otago mentor left on his ill-fated trip to coach Kenya, frustrated at the inaction in appointing a national selection manager (the job filled by Kim Littlejohn) and a New Zealand team manager (now Mike Sandle).
NZC should model the system on the set-up of the world's two best international coaches - South Africa's Gary Kirsten and England's Andy Flower. Let Hesson run the team with lieutenants to monitor bowling, batting, fielding, mental and physical fitness. Sure, other candidates such as South African mental conditioning coach Paddy Upton, Northern Districts coach Grant Bradburn and Wellington and former Bangladesh coach Jamie Siddons have merit.
Few men have as much respect around the cricketing community among players, coaching staff and media as Hesson. The 37-year-old's only hindrance is the public profile he lacks, by virtue of his own selflessness. He puts his players first, meaning he often works in the shadows to ensure his teams are in sync. Yet if ever New Zealand Cricket needed a Larry Mullen jnr (U2's little-known drummer) more than a Bono to keep the beat going in the background, it is now.
New chief executive David White has been left with a regime he did not commission and the Australianisation of the management ranks, led by cricket director John Buchanan, means a local presence in addition to Sandle would be welcome. Surely New Zealand needs to prove it can produce its own mentors, coaches and leaders rather than holding an overseas hand. In franchise sport, it is fine to pick the best coach from anywhere; in international sport, good reason is required not to pick from within; otherwise what is the point of domestic coaches being ambitious?