The second of a two-part interview with new College Sport chief executive Dave Currie.
Would you like to see College Sport relinquish the task of organising some of the 20 sports it currently has?
It's early days but we have to get closer to the regional sporting organisations. It's not about owning the sport, it comes back to the whole notion of sport in schools where sport is part of the educational framework. If children leave school and have not been educated, then we have failed. There needs to be a balance around all of that. It's not just about sport.
Schools are overburdened and under pressure. Some of the bigger sports have the resources, so it's about maximising what everyone can add. Cricket is a good example. Auckland Cricket Association is now running most of the cricket and it seems to be a really good model.
Are the perennial issues surrounding, say, the 1A rugby competition, Auckland Rugby Union or College Sport problems?
College Sport. We are charged with making sure there's a viable competition that it is fair and accessible and affordable. In my view, we don't have to run it but we have to make sure it complies with the principles we hold. Rugby is a good debate. Auckland Rugby is a bit protective around Auckland. College Sport is Greater Auckland, Counties Manukau and North Harbour.
Our role at College Sport is to bring together these schools and sports that meet everyone's needs the best we can. To give the board credit, they did realise a couple of years back that they were working in isolation, they did this review, said we have to work in partnership and started the process. Now that's always scary for everybody. I guess that's the role they have asked me to play, in the middle, how do we make it work.