Apples and oranges. That's what I just voted on for the Halberg Awards.
Comparing Kane Williamson's robotic batting year of 2015 against the dominant rowing pair of Hamish Bond and Eric Murray versus the cool head of Lydia Ko and the beautiful sum of the parts of an All Blacks machine. And don't forget Scott Dixon's timely run to another IndyCar title.
I've left people out. Their supporters will be disappointed. I tried not to show bias but that's why there are 28 members on the voting panel. Could all the judges meet like the old days and let dominant personalities argue and bicker about their choice? Will the more retiring types weather the storm? Should it be a public vote? That's more likely to skew the results due to motivated fans voting more than apathetic ones.
The Halbergs generate debate because in an attempt to highlight and celebrate winners, which is what we as a sports nation love to do, other overachievers end up losing.
But at least we're talking about the awards put on by the Halberg Disability Sport Foundation and the work it does.