Any doubts over Sparc's influence on sport in New Zealand and the lack of power of sport's governing bodies can be illustrated by the fallout from a recent Swimming New Zealand (SNZ) board meeting.
Swimming in New Zealand has fallen on tough times. Besieged recently by internal squabbling at an administrative and coaching level, the country's elite have not had a meaningful medal at an Olympic Games or world championships in 15 years. The scathing Ineson Report earlier this year led to argument, debate and eventually another review on the status of the sport.
The first draft of the latest review is due in April with the recommendations supposedly non-negotiable. That, combined with the elite team's Olympic performance, will determine whether swimming has a future as one of Sparc's targeted sports.
Sparc has generally claimed sports need the independence to work out their own problems despite offering a $6.6 million taxpayer investment in SNZ over this Olympic cycle.
However, Sparc chief executive Peter Miskimmin indicated that approach was wearing thin in August when he told the Herald on Sunday: "We have been concerned but have two independent directors on the SNZ board in Nelson Cull and Kerry McDonald. Clearly we want to see sound governance and leadership again. We had heard people felt a sense of disquiet but hopefully having two directors there is protecting the government investment."