This Act introduced the ability to "capitalise" the Family Benefit — which allowed families to take the entire amount which would be payable for a child, until age 16, as a lump sum, provided they were using it to buy a first home.
At $6 per week, the capitalised amount payable for a child from birth to 16 would be $4992 — although the legislation limited the capital sum to $4000 per family. This was still a substantial amount in 1964 — and would represent $86,000 in today's dollars.
Tens of thousands of Kiwi families took up this option to use the Family Benefit to buy their first home — including my mother and father who built a home in the new suburb of Pirimai, in Napier, in 1970.
According to my Mum it cost the princely sum of around $15,000 ($250,000 in 2019). Given I came from a family of seven kids we easily qualified for the full $4000 contribution. This represented 26 per cent of the total purchase price and was, according to my mum, the difference between buying and not buying a home.
The Family Benefit (and the ability to capitalise it) continued through until 1986, at which time it was replaced by the Family Support Scheme (now known as "Working for Families") by the Lange Labour Government.
This new policy targeted support to those who actually needed it rather than paying it universally, regardless of need — but this "means testing" element of the policy also meant that a family's circumstances could change and they may not qualify in any given year. Because of this, capitalisation was no longer viable, since a family could not be guaranteed to qualify for the programme throughout the life of a child.
Is it a coincidence that our rate of home ownership peaked just five years later, in 1991?
Probably not.
But how could we replicate the success of Family Benefit capitalisation without a return to the crude, clumsy and costly downsides of universal benefits?
One option might be to allow families to capitalise Family Support Tax Credit payments on the proviso they would be required to repay a portion of this amount in any year in which they did not qualify.
The numbers to provide an example are difficult to calculate as payments are tailored to individual family circumstances — but if the capitalised sum was set to a maximum of $50,000 and was claimed for the full qualification period of 18 years for a family with one child — that family would be required to repay up to $2700 in any year in they did not qualify, or in which their entitlement was reduced.
Since Family Support is now managed by IRD this would be relatively straightforward to monitor and manage.