But none had amounts that were above warning levels, and rates were generally comparable to those from the US and Canada.
Mercury and arsenic levels were higher for those who reported fish consumption in the 48 hours before blood being taken.
While there was no "notification level" for blood mercury, none of the participants had concentrations above Canada's set health threshold.
For both children and adults, the lowest levels of fluoride were observed in the South Island, likely reflecting regional differences in water fluoridation.
Concentrations of fluoride in New Zealand adults were marginally higher than those reported for Canada - but comparable to those reported for Brazil and Japan.
Concentrations of phthalates, commonly used as plasticisers in plastics, were the highest in the youngest age group, age 5 to 7.
For monoethyl phthalate, a metabolite of diethyl phthalate (DEP) which is commonly used in personal care products, levels were higher for women than men.
But all phthalates were again generally comparable with those reported for other countries.
Cotinine, analysed from urine samples, was detected among 11 per cent of adults and 2 per cent of children - and only Māori children.
For triclosan - an anti-bacterial agent added to many consumer products such as soaps, body washes, toothpastes, and some cosmetics - levels were higher among non-Māori, especially in children.
Both inorganic arsenic - in the form of solvent DMA - and thallium, showed geographic variation for both children and adults, with lowest levels observed for the South Island and highest for the north of the North Island.
Project leader Associate Professor Andrea 't Mannetje said as the study set a baseline for tracking exposure trends, it could help assess the effectiveness of policies aimed at reducing exposure to environmental chemicals.
"We now know what New Zealanders' exposure levels are for these very common environmental chemicals, as before we had no idea," she said.
"This means we can finally compare ourselves with other countries, and we are able to indicate how any individual's level compares with the general population, while before we had to rely on overseas data to know what was normal."
We can also see how exposure trends develop over time which will show the effectiveness of any action taken to reduce exposures, such has been shown for lead in other countries after removing lead from petrol."