The first being that WorkSafe had treated the directors as one group in the trial and its investigation by repeatedly referring to them as ‘the Buttles’.
“The allegation boils down to this: WorkSafe says Whakaari Management Limited breached a duty. Whakaari Management Limited was controlled by the Buttles, and if we use James as an example, James is a Buttle therefore James is liable. It really is that crude,” Cairney said.
He said the case was also flawed because WorkSafe had sought to treat any breach by WML as a breach by its directors as if it was a one-director company.
WorkSafe’s lawyer Michael Hodge rejected both claims in his reply on 1 September.
“While the court does of course need to consider the evidence against each defendant and reach a separate verdict in respect of each, there is a significant overlap in respect of the allegations and evidence against each Buttle,” Hodge said.
“While necessarily related, the allegations against the Buttles are separate and distinct from the allegations against WML.”