READ MORE:
• Why trees should be part of your responsible travel plan
• Protesters block removal of 350 trees at Ōwairaka/Mt Albert
• 'Exotics aren't evil': Protesters gather to stop removal of trees on Ōwairaka/Mt Albert
• Target: One Billion Trees
After mediation the Environment Court issued the consent order in September, with new conditions including greater community engagement.
Auckland Council staff recommend the board fully adopt the consented work which, although it could cause a "high magnitude of disturbance" to the existing flora and fauna, would allow a faster transition to a native forest ecosystem.
Planting will turn the site into a "healthy podocarp-broadleaf forest dominated by kauri, puriri, taraire and tanekaha, along with a native understorey".
Protesters have in the past called for a "tree by tree" managed approach to minimise disturbance, claiming clear-felling the pines would damage the understorey, which contains native flora and fauna.
Council staff said the board could delay its decision but that would mean the area remained closed. The pines were planted in the late 1920s and in the past 20 years have decayed from 700 trees in 1988 to 200 today, including 23 that are dead.
According to Nick Goldwater, a principal ecologist at Wildland Consultants Ltd, although the mature pines stored a lot of carbon they were sequestering very little.
The amount of carbon stored in the newly planted area could exceed that of the pine within 30-40 years, as long as it was properly maintained.
The board was supposed to make a decision in February, but the plans were delayed after Ngāti Whātua Ōrākeiaccused the board of consulting with the wrong mana whenua.
Historian Joe Pihema said the board had consulted Ngāti Awa - predominantly from Bay of Plenty - but failed to talk to them, RNZ reported.
The hapū was not the correct point of contact, and the information had not been shared, he said.
Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei Trust deputy chair Ngarimu Blair told the Herald they'd since engaged with the board and were happy with the process.
The lack of consultation was a "misstep", but had been addressed, Blair said.
"They've acknowledged [the lack of consultation], and for us it is water under the bridge.
"But overall we do have concerns with the council's engagement and consultation policy, and believe rather than a blanket invite to all tribes, that often results in poor response rates, it should really focus on those that have genuine, proven and tested relationships to areas."
If the board decides to get rid of the trees, the replanting will aim for 90 per cent cover of woody vegetation within five years, providing habitat for indigenous birds, lizards, invertebrates, and plants.
The project is expected to cost $760,000, plus $57,500 for maintenance and pest control over 15 years.