There is no evidence a top policeman committed perjury while giving evidence in a court case involving Kim Dotcom, the Independent Police Conduct Authority has found.
In August 2012 Detective Inspector Grant Wormald gave evidence in the High Court at Auckland relating to the search and arrest warrants executed by police at Dotcom's Coatesville property.
During the cross-examination Mr Wormald was asked twice whether he was aware of surveillance of Dotcom by police or any other New Zealand government organisation before January 19, 2012. He said he was not.
Later that year media reported the Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB) had intercepted the communications of Dotcom and an associate before the warrants were executed.
Following reports on TV One and TV3 stating that Mr Wormald's evidence had been shown to be untrue, a complaint was laid by Paul Davison, QC, alleging the inspector knew the evidence was false and misleading. Mr Davison requested a criminal investigation into possible perjury.