How much do pre-collections matter? It's an obvious question to ask at this time of year - no, not Christmas, but the time of pre-fall. At the start of the month. Karl Lagerfeld showed his for Chanel, and last week Raf Simons unveiled Dior's pre-fall wares in Tokyo.
When we - in the fashion industry - say "pre-fall", we mean the Americanisation of autumn, rather than the kind of fall that pride comes before, although fashion houses are inordinately proud of the sales figures of their pre-fall lines. Most will harp on about their importance to a half-listening journalist given any opportunity, a chance to emphasise the power of the label and the health of the business.
So, in business terms, pre-collections matter a lot. However, I wonder if they really matter at all to the consumers - at least, in the grand old scheme of seasons and labels.
Both Lagerfeld and Simons schlepped the press across the world to see their latest wares, and showed collections inspired to varying degrees by their locales. Simons did Christian Dior via Cio-Cio San, and there was plenty of Tyrolean schmaltz in Lagerfeld's outing, staged in a Salzburg schloss. Both looked fine and will doubtless find ample buyers.
But does anyone really care what we fashion folk decide to call these clothes - especially now that even the spring/summer-autumn/winter axis has devolved into a seasonless mush? Luxury clients today simply care about looking good and having new clothes.