Trial by media? No, thank you. It's hard to imagine anyone when presented with the option of trial by judge or jury, opting for a third option: "Ah may it please your Honour, I'd like to elect trial by media please."
That nightmare sprang to mind when I read Alison Mau in another newspaper announce they were setting up their own investigative, um… tribunal… to prosecute the #metoo campaign. Already I am at a loss as to how to describe it. A campaign? A witch-hunt? An initiative?
One of the reasons Mau gave for pursuing this idea was the "radio silence" in New Zealand following the Harvey Weinstein allegations. Well, I'm not so sure about that, but you will have to make up your own mind as to whether this issue has been frequently reported and discussed around New Zealand. I believe it has.
Perhaps the "radio silence" really means the absence of a prominent New Zealand Weinstein, hung, drawn and quartered as an example to the rest.
There are two questions to consider. Firstly, whether the #metoo movement needs a headquarters at all. And is a media organisation the right forum through which to investigate and prosecute these issues? To the first question I believe the answer is no. To the second, a resounding NO.
I would have thought the #metoo movement is something that has become part the zeitgeist. It reflects a change in attitude in society's conscience. To the creeps and predators it says, your time is up. And to victims it provides reassurance that they live in a society where their concerns will be taken seriously.
Again, without citing chapter and verse, I think you have been hiding under a rock to be unaware of reports and discussions throughout conventional and social media, to think that this issue isn't prominent in people's minds.