Alan Swan Norman, left, Tremain Whetu Wiremu Vic Turfry-Ross, and Tukotahi King during sentencing today in the High Court at Nelson. Photo / Stuff
The victim of a gang-related killing in Nelson was “too good for this world”, his mother said through tears today.
Tukotahi King, Tremain Whetu Wiremu Vic Turfry-Ross, and Alan Swan Norman have been sentenced to prison in the High Court at Nelson on charges related to the death of Lake Takimoana in February last year after a home invasion.
Takimoana’s sister described through tears as she read her victim impact statement to the court that her brother was the heart of the family, now broken by what had happened.
King was initially charged with murder, Turfry-Ross, 26, with being party to murder, while Norman was initially charged with aggravated burglary.
They pleaded guilty to amended charges two days into a trial this year.
King, 32, described as the lead offender, was sentenced to eight years and three months in prison for manslaughter, with a minimum parole period of five years and six months.
Turfry-Ross was sentenced to five years and eight months in prison on charges of manslaughter and arson.
Norman, 33, was sentenced to four years and eight months on charges of aggravated burglary, arson and being an accessory after the fact to manslaughter, with no minimum parole period sought.
The defendants, who were all associated with the Killer Beez gang, knew Takimoana, 22, and his partner.
At 1.13pm on February 22 last year the defendants and at least one unknown associate travelled in a Toyota Hilux ute and a black Mazda Axela driven by Norman, to the victim’s home in Nelson.
One parked in the driveway and the other across the driveway entrance.
King, Turfry-Ross and the associate ran to the house while Norman waited by the vehicles.
A summary of facts said there was no evidence Norman knew they had a gun but he knew about the bats, which were large enough to be visible to witnesses from some distance away.
King and Turfry-Ross had disguised their faces with “neck gaiters” pulled up over their mouths, while the associate wore a balaclava.
King carried the gun - described today as a pistol, which was about 30 centimetres long and had a wooden stock.
Takimoana was in his bedroom with his partner and saw the defendants so went to the front door.
After entering the house King pointed the firearm at Takimoana and walked him backwards towards the bedroom, where they told him to get on the ground.
The victim’s partner recognised King and Turfry-Ross as they had only the lower part of their face covered.
Lawyer for the Crown, Jackson Webber said the “very powerful, dignified” victim impact statements highlighted how senseless and pointless Takimoana’s death was.
But it was also predictable: “A group of men from one gang taking weapons and confronting someone from a rival gang and someone got killed”, Webber said.
He said it did not make the situation any better that Takimoana was not the man they were looking for, and that he had been an innocent bystander, in his own bedroom, minding his own business.
King’s lawyer, Auckland barrister Iswari Jayanandan, said the manslaughter charge he eventually admitted ought to have been resolved earlier and he deserved credit for what in effect became an early guilty plea to that amended charge.
Turfry-Ross, a 501 deportee, had since his return to New Zealand from Australia been largely isolated, on his own with little support, his lawyer Tony Bamford said.
As a result, he had gravitated towards gangs for support and practical assistance.
He said the target of the “ridiculous escapade” was not in fact the occupant of the house, and the tragedy for everyone was that Takimoana had been a friend of Turfry-Ross, and their respective partners had also been close friends.
“He carries a heavy burden and will do so for years, if not his whole life.”
Justice Isac said he hadn’t been an “idle bystander”, and that while Takimoana’s death was not intended, Turfry-Ross nonetheless knew it was a possible consequence of their actions that day that someone “might get shot”.
The lawyer for Norman, John Sandston said he was another example of how society had failed those in state care.
“It doesn’t excuse him but it’s a big factor among many that the court needs to take into account.”
Sandston said Norman had been “shelved away”, and had no choice about being disunited from his whānau, but he did have a choice about his later addiction to methamphetamine.
Justice Isac acknowledged the grief and immense loss faced by Takimoana’s whānau.
“Nothing I can say will make their suffering any easier and none of us should lose sight of the fact a young life has been lost.”
Justice Isac acknowledged the defendants’ childhoods marred by violence, deprivation and substance abuse, and that it was no real surprise they had gravitated toward gangs.
Tracy Neal is a Nelson-based Open Justice reporter at NZME. She was previously RNZ’s regional reporter in Nelson-Marlborough and has covered general news, including court and local government for the Nelson Mail.