Commentators also expect the Supreme Court’s decision will allow councils in other parts of the country to more easily set alcohol policy in the areas they’re responsible for.
This is as it should be - most New Zealanders want their elected representatives to have the ability to set reasonable limits on the sale of alcohol in the communities they serve.
As former North Shore Mayor and ex-Auckland Councillor George Wood wrote last week, Auckland’s local alcohol policy “includes vital provisions to restrict the proliferation of bottle stores in lower socio-economic areas across Auckland - a measure designed to reduce alcohol-related harm in vulnerable communities”.
Two studies released in April showed how excessive alcohol consumption was putting immense pressure on hospital emergency departments, fuelling an increase in abuse and violence against staff and adding to waiting times for all patients.
Alcohol was also a factor in more than half of the fatal crashes across New Zealand in 2022.
Some police statistics say a third of all crimes are committed by someone who has consumed alcohol beforehand.
Experiments with tighter regulations on alcohol sales have seen mixed results in this country; some link New Zealand’s binge-drinking culture with our 50-year experiment of early pub closing and the infamous 6 o‘clock swill.
But the measures proposed in Auckland’s policy are by no means extreme. They may of course impact the bottom lines of supermarkets, liquor chains, and the small business owners who operate standalone stores. They may also be inconvenient to some people who want nothing more than to enjoy more drinks with family and friends at home after 9pm.
The best people to balance those competing interests with the harm that alcohol can cause are local communities. And that’s exactly what the policy provides.