Mike Hosking, Kerre McIvor, Leighton Smith and Larry Williams have had "The Final Word" on who they think will win tomorrow's General Election and why.
Newstalk ZB hosts have come together to predict the election outcome.
Mike Hosking, Kerre McIvor, Leighton Smith and Larry Williams had "The Final Word" on who they think will win tomorrow's General Election and why.
So, without further ado, we present their arguments and predictions.
Although he did believe National had been caught out on their social policies.
Moving on to New Zealand First leader Winston Peters, Hosking said he believed this would be Peters' last election.
"He's aged," he said.
Referring to the dramatic polls that have been conducted over the past few weeks, Hosking said there were enough polls to see a trend but that "it could go [still go] either way".
Speaking on the hot election topics of housing and healthcare specifically, Hosking said he understood young people had been locked out of the property market but that housing was expensive all over the world.
Talking about health, Hosking said it was all very well for the opposition to say they will fund more healthcare but that "you will never quench the thirst of the health in this country".
Larry Williams
Prediction: National- NZ First coalition.
Larry Williams referred to Ardern as a "flake". He said he believed Ardern was the least qualified leader in the history of New Zealand.
On the topic of English, Williams said the National leader was "no John Key" and "not great on TV".
He said National lacked vision, which had played a role in New Zealand's infrastructure deficit.
Ardern is "incredibly good" if she can avoid the answers because, "she doesn't have them", he said.
Responding to Larry Williams' claim that National lacked vision, Smith asked: "Why do people need a vision, why can't we have our own vision?"
"If you have a constant vision you're going to have vision fatigue."
Smith said that the absurdity of the MMP voting system was the fact that after the election, all the parties have to compromise because there isn't enough money, which results in many pre-election promises not being fulfilled.