The rise of insider terrorism, remote radicalisation, and citizens leaving mainstream media for narrower, often prejudice-reinforcing sources, has helped us realise the importance of liberal education. That has resulted in many European countries coming to regard subjects such as citizenship and history as too important not to be a compulsory part of any national curriculum.
To make liberal arts more popular – and enliven curriculum choices that have been narrowed by credit-crunching or will-this-get-me-a-job criteria – why not promote senior colleges capable of offering broader choices?
And what could revolutionise a liberal arts programme, for all ability levels, are user-friendly, IT backups. Experts could produce and continuously edit the growing explosion of YouTubes, Ted-talks, animations and Discovery-style video clips.
What a huge time-save for actual teaching if the most relevant IT resources could be readily accessible – and discussion-ready – by category, duration and ability level.
Another change needed to allow students to become contributing citizens is the abolition of five years' single-sex secondary schools. The collaboration needed between men and women if they are to have fulfilling lives and live in a harmonious society is not nurtured by separating boys and girls for most of their teens.
There is no reason why some local schools couldn't combine for at least senior-class co-education.
The principal of Adelaide's Scotch College, Dr John Newton, says he wouldn't dream of sending his children to single-sex schools even though both he and his wife attended them. Graduates of single-sex schools "carried an emotional handicap that could last 20 years", he says.
Oxford-educated and formerly principal at an established English co-ed for 10 years, Newton questions why parents would want to send their children to schools where they "miss out on that vital piece of emotional intelligence, how to work with the opposite sex". And girls need confidence, he believes, to take on boys and work with them.
There is nothing wrong with pupils studying subjects such as tourism and hospitality or being taught to work with their hands, but today they need also to understand the basics of mind-broadening subjects like classical studies, art history, literature, psychology, comparative religions, philosophy and ethics.
If students are denied that wide sweep of knowledge their adult lives will be bereft. They will not fully understand who they are, where they came from and the workings of the society that surrounds them.
The lack of federal-wide civics education in high schools may explain much about modern America's dysfunctional democracy and woeful voter turnout. New Zealand should learn from the narrowing of the American mind.
As a nation we need to review our curriculum and include the compulsory teaching of subjects long recognised as necessary to the formation of mature and contributing adults.
• Steve Liddle, a researcher based in Napier, is a former teacher in both co-ed and single-sex schools in New Zealand and the UK.