The man, also a beneficiary, asked if he could buy the television on finance, paying it off in fortnightly instalments.
“The representative was now aware that they were selling a very expensive, high-definition TV to a blind beneficiary. He did not question this, but went straight to his credit team for finance approval,” the carer said.
“Finance was approved, and the TV has since been delivered. There was no help offered for installation. [My client] called me to help, which is how I became aware of the situation.”
A spokeswoman for Consumer NZ said Spark’s sale could be considered “unconscionable conduct” given the man was in a vulnerable position and this was noted on his file. She recommended a complaint be laid with the Commerce Commission.
The Herald has approached the Commerce Commission for comment.
A Spark spokeswoman said their customer advisor “correctly followed the strict processes we have in place for customer sales” during the call and said their sales techniques took into account customers’ needs.
After the man’s carer complained, Spark told him his client decided to buy the TV because it had in-built accessibility features such as voice commands but offered to cancel the sale.
“We ... explained the above and offered for the TV to be returned and costs credited, however, this has not been accepted by the carer,” the company’s spokeswoman said.
The man’s carer claimed Spark was trying to dismiss his complaint by saying his client had agreed to buy the TV.
“How many other vulnerable people are being sold products they don’t need or can’t afford?” he said.
Raphael Franks is an Auckland-based reporter who covers breaking news. He joined the Herald as a Te Rito cadet in 2022.