SIS head Rebecca Kitteridge has denied she was scaremongering or misleading the public about New Zealanders going to the Middle East as so-called 'jihadi brides' and says she still believes it is a serious concern for New Zealand's security.
In an interview with the Herald, Ms Kitteridge said she had spoken about jihadi brides at a select committee last December because they were a genuine security concern and the women were more likely to return to New Zealand than to Australia, even if they had previously lived in Australia. Ms Kitteridge was criticised in March after it was revealed those women had actually been living in and left from Australia rather than New Zealand. That prompted Opposition MPs and some in the Muslim community to criticise Prime Minister John Key and Ms Kitteridge for being misleading and scaremongering by failing to clarify that.
In her first media interviews since then, Ms Kitteridge told the Herald she did not believe she had been misleading. "The information I gave was accurate."
"In the case of the women who travelled to Syria, I explained they were New Zealand women who had travelled to the Middle East to marry Jihadi fighters. That was my focus, because that is the security issue. The concern for me was the fact we had these citizens in the Middle East who are quite likely, if they survive the experience, to return here."
She said it was more likely those women would return to New Zealand than Australia because Australia was likely to turn them away. Its anti-terrorism laws allowed it to deny entry and revoke citizenship from foreign fighters and those involved in terrorist groups. "So if those women survive their experience they will return, probably at some point. It is more likely they will come here than go to Australia even if they were entitled to live in Australia because the Australians are not too keen on having returnees."
She said those woman could be at risk themselves of getting killed, could be radicalised and used for terrorism activity or radicalising others online.