It was a brave move of New Zealand universities last week to admit that they are not attracting enough of the "best and brightest" graduates to train as teachers. Two universities even released data to the Herald showing students accepted into teaching degrees have some of the lowest entrance scores compared with bachelor programmes in other disciplines.
The fact that even the universities are prepared to be open about what is sensitive and damning data is an indication of how desperate the situation has become. The pressure that school principals are now applying on universities (and the Government) to once-and-for-all raise the bar to enter teaching is becoming a public issue.
The Herald reports that some teaching programmes have responded to a drop in trainee numbers by lowering the bar in an attempt to increase uptake. The current reversal of that strategy seems to be an admission that if you want to make teaching a high-status profession its entry criteria need to be challenging and at the level for our country's most talented individuals to aspire to.
The sector faces a number of tradeoffs. Should universities adopt a "bums on seats" approach to teacher training, recruiting as many people as possible and getting as much student funding as possible, hoping that as many of those as they train will be employed by schools? Or should universities have more of a moral responsibility to work more closely with schools to better match their workforce needs, and be brave enough to turn away those who are less suitable for teaching?