“You need to be out connecting with people, understanding what is going on for them and how a government could help them,” Luxon explained his decision to return to McDonald’s for a day. I worked in hospitality as a student and I don’t believe Luxon understands anything about low-income earners and people who are struggling financially. The cost-of-living crisis is hitting low-income earners aggressively. I cannot fathom why, amid such a crisis, the National Party thinks giving wealthy New Zealanders more money will help the poor in any way.
The National Party saying giving the wealthy tax cuts during a cost-of-living crisis will help the poor is like throwing bread in a pool and expecting toast. It is an awful plan. The National Party’s tax package is a recipe for failure. Luxon should not offer the wealthy massive tax cuts to help the poor. Trickle-down economics has never worked for New Zealand. Take the last 180 years, for example. He should support a tax-free income threshold to allow poor people to keep more of their money while comprehensively taxing the rich to make up for the lost revenue.
Luxon’s publicity stunt is manipulative and cunning. He’s pretending to be a cool, relatable Kiwi guy, but his act insults McDonald’s workers across the country whose pay comes nothing close to a living wage. I find Luxon’s actions especially insidious, knowing that education levels and political awareness among low-income earners is low. Luxon is attempting to be relatable to vulnerable people for their votes. New Zealanders should be wary of politicians who pretend to be in solidarity with the poor but legislate for the rich.
Luxon in McDonald’s uniform is the equivalent of a wolf in sheep’s clothing. The National Party can pretend to care about the poor, but I see right through the act. Luxon can keep flipping the burgers, but he only serves the rich.
Shaneel Shavneel Lal (they/them) was instrumental in the bill to ban conversion therapy in New Zealand. They are a law and psychology student, model and influencer.