Malcolm Rewa, after an almost unprecedented third trial, has been found guilty of murdering Susan Burdett in her South Auckland home in 1992.
The jury took just under four hours to return their unanimous verdict today after hearing two weeks of evidence and arguments in the High Court at Auckland.
"How do you find the defendant?" the foreman was asked.
When just 17 years old, Pora was arrested and later twice wrongly convicted for murdering Burdett.
He spent 22 years in prison before the Privy Council quashed his conviction in 2015 and has since received an apology from the Government and $3.5 million in compensation.
Outside the High Court, private investigator Tim McKinnel, who fought to get Pora out of prison, said the guilty verdict was a combination of "justice and trust".
"Burdett's family and friends have endured 27 years of hardship but today we have seen justice merged with truth."
McKinnel said the five trials - Rewa's three and Pora's two - had been tough-going for Burdett's family with a great deal of uncertainty and difficult times.
McKinnel said he had spoken to Burdett's brother Jim when he started working on Pora's case and he was "incredibly understanding" and had a lot of questions.
"It was important for us that we acknowledge [Burdett's family] in this. It wasn't ever just about Teina.
"It always involved two families - Teina and Susan's, you couldn't deal with one without the other."
In a statement, Detective Superintendent Dave Lynch said police welcomed the jury's verdict in convicting Rewa of Burdett's murder.
"Police wish to thank all the witnesses who came to court to give evidence," Lynch said. "We appreciate it has been both difficult and traumatic for people having to relive their experiences of the case some 26 years later.
"[We] also want to acknowledge the Crown and police investigation team for their work over the better part of the last two years preparing this case for trial."
Two juries fail to find Rewa guilty
Rewa was convicted of the 39-year-old's rape in 1998 - but two juries that year were unable to decide whether he was also responsible for her death.
A stay of proceedings for a murder prosecution against Rewa had previously been applied by the Solicitor-General in 1998.
But in 2017 the Deputy Solicitor-General, Brendan Horsley, on behalf of the Attorney-General, reversed the 1998 stay to allow the third trial.
Wednesday, March 25, 1992, is a day Steven Dawson will never forget.
Burdett was lying naked on her bed, her upper half covered with a blood-soaked blue duvet and her legs crossed and hanging over the side of the bed.
In front of her, almost parallel, was a baseball bat she would keep nearby for protection.
Brain matter and a significant amount of blood was on the sheets, while a bra covered Burdett's eyes.
The way Burdett's body was found was also a telltale sign of Rewa's involvement.
"You can be sure he's guilty of murder for two main reasons," Kayes said. "The first is that the attack on Susan Burdett had all the hallmarks of a typical Rewa sexual assault."
The jury heard 20 of Rewa's other rape cases, several of which included the victim having had their legs crossed or dangling, eyes blindfolded, and top half covered.
The weapon, Crown prosecutor Gareth Kayes said, was the baseball bat.
But during the trial, forensic scientist Dr SallyAnn Harbison said she was only able to detect "four tiny spots of blood" on the bat with the help of a microscope.
However, a test to establish if the blood was human came back inconclusive and Harbison agreed there was no forensic evidence directly relating the bat to Burdett's killing.
Foreign DNA found inside Burdett's body thought was almost certainly Rewa's, Harbison said.
Former Detective Senior Sergeant Neil Grimstone, the police officer who was in charge of the scene, said it was "quite different to anything I had encountered before".
"It was very orderly," he said. "The whole house was tidy."
But, Grimstone added: "You never get two murder scenes that are the same."
Earlier in the trial a member of the public sitting in the gallery hissed at Rewa.
"In prison you get all walks of life - some of the crimes are worse than others - but unless it's against you, you accept them for who they are, not what they've done."
Rewa said he felt "terrible shame" about his rape convictions, but has always denied raping and murdering Burdett.
"No I didn't ... If I was guilty of it, yes I would [say I did that]," he said of Burdett's killing.
"It would be difficult not to, if you were guilty of it".
To explain how his semen was found inside Burdett's body, Rewa told the court the pair were in a secret sexual relationship.
He said they would have sex at the summit of Māngere Mountain and watch the sunset.
"You had ample opportunity to travel from Whangārei, get into [Burdett's] house, kill your mother, leave the house, and get back home," he said during his cross-examination of McKay.
But McKay, who reconnected with his mum when he was 20, said he wasn't aware Burdett's will had been amended until her death.
"So what are you accusing me of?" McKay said.
"I thought the question was pretty clear," Chambers said.
He also recalled for the court the day his mum's body was discovered. He was at work and overheard a radio news bulletin.
"A 39-year-old woman living alone in Papatoetoe had been found bludgeoned to death," the broadcast said, with each passing hour providing further updates.
"I thought 'nah, can't be, couldn't possibly be'," McKay said, before later leaning the tragic truth.
"She says, 'I've got something to tell you and I don't want you to tell anyone else'.
"She says, 'I don't want anyone else to know'.
"She did tell me his full name but I only remember the name Mike," Ansty said.
Ansty, however, only came forward to police in 2017 and in an email said the mystery man was "Mike Rewa".
During his evidence, Rewa said he was known by other names, including Michael and Hammer.
But also in the email, Ansty said: "I always believed it was Mike or Malcolm Rewa who had killed Sue ... I was very relieved when he was incarcerated ... I think this is probably the last chance to get justice for her."
Kayes argued Ansty's evidence was "wholly unreliable".
"She has got the whole thing hopelessly garbled," he said.
But Chambers said her memories were simply suppressed.
"The memories are not lost," he said.
"When they return they are clear and unequivocal."
Justice Venning earlier dismissed an application to stay the murder charge against Rewa and last May further declined an application by Chambers for a judicial review of the decision to lift the stay.
A stay had never before been lifted in New Zealand's legal history.
During pre-trial hearings, Chambers also argued media publicity and a dramatised 90-minute television film about Pora's case, In Dark Places, was prejudicial to Rewa's case.
"There is sufficient prejudice, sufficient hostility, sufficient time to make a fair trial impossible for the defendant," Chambers argued.
Justice Venning did not publicly release his reasons for allowing the third trial to proceed but simply said: "I am satisfied that Mr Rewa can receive a fair trial ... and that it is in the interests of justice for the trial to proceed."
Rewa was also denied parole last May - his first hearing before the Parole Board.
The written decision will not be publicly released, while his next scheduled parole hearing is for April 2020.