Blood stains are seen on the wall and on a Jesus Christ statue at the St. Sebastian's Church after blast in Negombo. Photo / AP
New Zealand security expert Paul Buchanan says it's unlikely that coordinated bomb attacks in Sri Lanka were a response to the Christchurch mosque shootings.
Buchanan's comments follow claims on social media from Islamic State supporters who boasted that the attacks were revenge for the Christchurch massacre last month.
Buchanan, director of 36th Parallel Assessments, said given the co-ordinated nature of the Sri Lankan bombings and intel warnings which were ignored, it would seem a month was too little time to prepare for such an attack.
SITE Intelligence Group director Rita Katz says IS supporters had boasted on social media that Colombo was revenge for Christchurch.
Katz said IS media channels were "posting rampantly" about the explosions and praying "may Allah accept" the attackers, indicating the group may be planning to claim responsibility.
"While such a claim may frame the op as revenge for New Zealand, this was likely planned long before," she said.
Buchanan said the attack appears to be an attempt to sow sectarian hatred in Sri Lanka, also adding they appear to have been planned prior to the March 15 events.
"Christchurch seems to be a convenient justification for something that was being planned before March 15 and has more to do with ethnic-religious conflict in Sri Lanka," he said.