Since the not guilty verdicts were given, tensions had been running high in the parent community, Ms Chilwell said, and pressure put on the board of trustees meant they would not pursue suppression for the teacher concerned.
Justice Mary Peters granted the application but said in the absence of any such argument for the teacher, his name suppression would lapse tomorrow.
However, the defendant cannot be named because doing so would identify the school.
At trial, defence lawyer Richard Earwaker said his client -- a grandfather with more than 40 years' teaching experience and the recipient of a prestigious award -- may have been unwise with his physical contact with students, but there was nothing indecent about it.
"But being unwise or stupid doesn't make you a criminal," Mr Earwaker said.
He warned the jury not to assume the number of charges made the man guilty and suggested he had been the victim of schoolyard gossip among both students and their parents.