Restaurant Brands Properties Ltd was fined $30,000 for purchasing land at Massey Rd, Māngere East, to build a drive-through KFC without Overseas Investment Office consent. Photo / Alex Burton
Restaurants Brands Properties Ltd was fined $30,000 for breaching foreign investment rules in an Auckland land purchase.
The company failed to obtain necessary consent for the $2.65 million deal for a KFC site.
Law firm Meredith Connell did not provide guidance on the need for Overseas Investment Office consent.
A major fast food company has been fined $30,000 for breaching foreign investment rules when it purchased Auckland land for a drive-through KFC restaurant.
And one of the country’s top law firms has been caught up in the dispute, accused of failing to provide “any advice or guidance” about the need to obtain consent when drafting a sale and purchase agreement for the $2.65 million deal.
Documents released to the Herald under the Official Information Act show Restaurants Brands Properties Ltd (RBPL) purchased a 2ha site on Massey Rd, Māngere East, in March 2023.
It had resource consent to transform the commercial boarding house then operating on the site into a drive-through KFC restaurant.
However, the company is foreign-owned and needed Overseas Investment Office (OIO) consent before settling on the deal because the residential land was considered sensitive under the Overseas Investment Act.
RBPL is 75 per cent Mexican-owned. It is described as the property holding company for the Restaurant Brands Group, which operates a suite of big fast food chains, including KFC, Carl’s Jr, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell.
RBPL is owned by Restaurant Brands New Zealand Ltd, which is listed on the New Zealand stock exchange.
The documents show that RBPL entered into a sale and purchase agreement on March 10, 2023, with vendor Massey Road Ltd to acquire the land for $2.65m. The agreement was subject to due diligence conditions but was not conditional on the purchaser obtaining OIO consent.
The contract eventually went unconditional, meaning the company had “acquired an equitable interest in sensitive land” in breach of the Act.
RBPL realised the error prior to the contract’s settlement date and alerted the watchdog before obtaining legal title.
A memorandum to OIO enforcement manager Simon Pope in October 2023 from a compliance investigator outlined how the breach occurred and discussed enforcement options.
The document said neither RBPL nor its conveyancing legal advisers, Meredith Connell, identified the need for consent prior to signing the contract.
“Neither party correctly identified that the land was residential under the Act.
“The RBPL staff handling the purchase transaction appear to have had insufficient knowledge concerning the overseas investment rules and incorrectly concluded that the land was commercial.
“Meredith Connell drafted the ASP [agreement for sale and purchase] for RBPL but did not appear to provide any advice or guidance about the need for consent.”
RBPL self-reported the “inadvertent” breach after becoming aware of the error and co-operated with the OIO investigation.
The memorandum recommended imposing a $30,000 administrative penalty, which was not considered “unduly harsh or oppressive” given the circumstances of the case and amount paid for the land.
“RBPL has co-operated with our investigation and has advised us about changes they are implementing to their processes and procedures to ensure appropriate checks are done/advice sought prior to entering into agreements.