Pupils deliver their verdict

WHAT do the consumers think after 10 years of Tomorrow's Schools? The following is taken from unedited written comments by former pupils.

Edward Murphy, ex-Auckland Grammar, studying psychology at Auckland University: "I don't believe that general secondary school academics prepares you properly for an environment like university. Although Grammar is often criticised because of its huge roll of over 2000, I believe that this is one of its greatest strengths. Because there are so many students you have to be entirely responsible for yourself and how you adhere to the system which the school is run by."

Eliza Oseterika, ex-Tangaroa College, studying communications: "The standard of education delivered in school is often measured by the exam results it can produce. However, I believe to be well educated is to be able to think for oneself, to understand that people have differing beliefs and accepts that you can learn something from the most powerful person in the world to the poorest beggar. It's what my school taught me and how I will succeed."

David Willcox, ex-Northcote College, part-time child-minder: "Subjects at school were aimed at more academically minded people, where I feel I am practically orientated. The practical subjects offered limited choices. Now I find that I am looking for a job but all the jobs offered want people with experience and are not prepared to take trainees."

Alice Holdem, ex-Epsom Girls Grammar, hairdresser: "During my years at high school I enjoyed most things. I felt the quality of teaching was good and the resources such as computers, the audio-visual suite and for PE were excellent. I thought EGGS lacked a range of subjects such as graphics and technical drawing because they're more designed to get you a job. But it did have excellent drama and music areas."