THE storm of Facebook protest over our coverage of the findings of the Carterton balloon tragedy is fascinating, because it is reportage I am proud to display prominently in our paper.
Firstly, it was reportage on what an enquiry and a team of professionals had concluded as to where the fault lay in this disaster. Let's be honest here, it was about as close to a cut-and-paste job as you get with newspaper reportage. What they said, we reported for the benefit of those who could not literally be at the commission's media conference, ie the readership.
Secondly, the Times-Age is not going to be afraid of reporting what the enquiry has made pretty obvious: The pilot was at fault because of his poor judgment, disdain for Civil Aviation rules and his probable use of cannabis impairing his judgment.
I can only assume the pro-marijuana brigade are behind many of the cries of "lies" at our reportage with regards to drug use. Frankly, it's pathetic. Journalists might well operate on the basis of impartiality when it comes to people's opinions, that ideology is better than truth, no facts are immutable, and every statement is as good as any other statement, but seriously, sometimes the truth needs to triumph over the knee-jerk opinions of idiots who think that marijuana use is harmless.
This is a time when the facts can speak for themselves and let's not be afraid to go down the path of the truth and reach some painful conclusions.