"No, I don't know detail around those complaints that were made within the [Francis] report," Ardern said.
She would not comment on a report that the most serious of the allegations against the man consisted of a high-five and a hug because she was unable to verify that.
"You've asked me to comment on the Francis report which had allegations within it, that I have not seen the detail of, that were provided confidentially and that were provided under that banner to ensure that those who were the victims felt able to come forward and speak openly to the inquirer so I simply cannot comment on what you're stating."
Asked whether Mallard should have referred to rape when he didn't have those details either, Ardern said she could not comment on the detail he was commenting on at the time.
"I assume it was the detail of the Francis report and I simply do not know what the Speaker knows or does not know about the Francis report."
Mallard told reporters last week he was not privy to any details of the complaints made to Debbie Francis for her review, and Francis herself was to pains to point out the confidentiality of the report.
Mallard would not comment on any matter yesterday.
Last week during an interview with RNZ, Mallard referred to the alleged assaults, saying: "We're talking about serious sexual assault. Well that, for me, that's rape."
The man at the centre of the allegations said a colleague at the centre of the unsubstantiated complaint against him three years earlier had come forward again after complainants were urged to do so by Mallard.
"At no time was I spoken to by the review's head Debbie Francis which I thought I would have been considering an alleged incident had been investigated and was found to be without merit," the man said.
The complaint, laid last year two years after the incident happened, was ruled to be unsubstantiated.
NewstalkZB has seen a copy of the investigation against him, which bore out everything he said found the claim against him was unsubstantiated.