KEY POINTS:
The final leaders' debate between Helen Clark and John Key was far from "the decider" it was billed as, Herald readers found.
Of 53 readers who responded to a poll asking for their views on the debate, 45 per cent said neither the Labour nor National leader had the edge on the other, although 40 per cent felt Mr Key won the final televised stoush.
All in all, viewers said they were uninspired.
"After having watched the US presidential contest, this debate seemed dull and lacking in vision, with none of the two contenders making any effort to actively gain voter confidence," said one.
Another viewer said neither leader seemed keen to "tread on any toes".
"Both John Key and Helen Clark skirted around the questions and didn't actually have a real debate on any of the issues. It seemed like they wanted to not tread on any toes and not upset anyone so close to the election date."
But of those who gave the debate to Mr Key, it was his apparent decisiveness and confidence that won them over.
"I felt that John Key stood out more than Helen Clark. He has grown in confidence and stature," one said.
"John appeared to be more decisive and I think he portrayed the image that it was time for a change and that he really meant business."
But 11 per cent of viewers handed the debate to Helen Clark, with one saying she "simply outclasses" her rival in experience and ability.
"Helen's responses all reflected substance, experience, wisdom and a clear and wise international perspective," said one. "Key was trying to score points, but Helen was focused on truth and facts."
