An April ministerial briefing from Treasury says the Labour Government’s poverty targets were “no longer realistically achievable”. Photo / 123rf
An April ministerial briefing from Treasury says the Labour Government’s poverty targets were “no longer realistically achievable”. Photo / 123rf
Top officials advised the Government it would cost $3 billion a year for New Zealand to reach the childpoverty reduction target set by the last Government.
The Green Party says the Government should stump up with the cash and the advice proves that “poverty is a political choice”.
But Child Poverty Reduction Minister Louise Upston said this is a cheque she won’t be writing, and she will be working to reduce child poverty through other means.
An April, a ministerial briefing from Treasury revealed the Labour Government’s poverty targets were “no longer realistically achievable”.
In 2018, then-Child Poverty Reduction Minister (now Dame) Jacinda Ardern set a long-term goal of reducing the number of children experiencing “material hardship” from 13.3% down to 6% by mid 2028.
The latest data show that target will be missed significantly; Statistics New Zealand figures show 12.5% of children – some 143,700 kids – are experiencing material hardship.
The previous Government pointed to factors such as the Covid-19 pandemic as reasons for missing the target.
Nevertheless, officials at the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet (DPMC) advised that, given the Government is currently so far off achieving this year’s intermediate target of 9%, the long-term 6% target by mid-2028 was unrealistic.
“The necessary year-on-year progress is not on track and the estimated costs of now meeting these targets would require investment in the region of $3 billion per year,” officials advised, according to documents released under the Official Information Act.
They also presented two other “lower ambition targets” for 2028 – which they said were more realistic and could be achievable without spending more money.
But Upston’s office has confirmed the minister rejected both options, which would have seen the current 6% material hardship target increase – likely to a figure closer to 10%.
Child Poverty Reduction Minister Louis Upston. Photo / Mark Mitchell
However, she said the Government won’t be spending the extra $3 billion a year to achieve that 6% target that she said it was sticking to.
Instead, Upston believes a more effective way to lift children out of poverty is by growing the economy and cutting taxes.
She said the official advice was based on modelling of what would have needed to be spent to carry on the previous Government’s child poverty approach, such as increasing benefits.
Meanwhile, Upston pointed the finger at Labour over its inability to meet the child poverty targets that it set when it was in office.
“It left office with a growing number of families trapped by long-term welfare dependency, a growing number of children living in benefit-dependent homes, and low-to-middle income New Zealanders falling further behind due to the cost-of-living crisis that resulted from their economic mismanagement.”
Meanwhile, the Green Party’s child poverty reduction spokesman Ricardo Menéndez March said the $3b price tag shows “poverty is a political choice”.
“A choice the current Government has chosen to preserve and prolong time and time again with decisions that put an already privileged few before essentially everyone else.”
Menéndez March pointed out the cost of reinstating the full interest deductions for residential property – often described as the landlords’ tax cut – was $2.9 billion.
Green Party child poverty reduction spokesman Ricardo Menendez-March. Photo / Mark Mitchell
“We can afford to end poverty, but we simply cannot afford to allow more and more children to fall through the cracks.”
Earlier this year, Upston reassessed the child poverty targets in line with legislation requiring the new Government to pick a new, intermediate target.
The previous Government had set a goal of reducing the number of children experiencing material hardship from 13.3% down to 9% by June this year.
The latest retrospective data from February shows 12.5% of children are experiencing material hardship.
A child is experiencing material hardship if their household does not have six or more basic needs including the ability to afford fresh fruit and vegetables and the ability to regularly see a doctor.
In light of where the current material hardship numbers are at, Upston set the intermediate target at 11% – 2 percentage points higher than the Labour Government’s goal for that year.
The Greens said this was unambitious, but Upston said the previous Government’s 9% goal was no longer realistically achievable.
“Our new targets are ambitious, but also reflect the reality of the economic and social climate the country is in today.”
In 2018, the Labour/NZ First Government enshrined into law a suite of child poverty measures. There are three primary measures of child poverty, but the “material hardship” category is seen as the bellwether measure.
When set, the proportion of children experiencing material hardship was 13.3%. As well as legislating targets, the Labour Government set a short, medium and long-term child poverty goal:
By June 2021: reduce the proportion of children in material hardship to 10%
By June 2024: reduce the proportion of children material hardship to 9% (this Government has set another 11% target for mid 2027, as it says the 2024 target won’t be achieved)
By June 2028: reduce the proportion of children in material hardship by 6%
