ELIZABETH STILES-DAWE
Whanganui
Drink to benefits
We shouldn't be hopping mad over a beer named "Wanganui" (Abe Leach's story, Chronicle May 16).
Instead, we should look at in a positive light — free publicity for our fair city. Imagine a few scotties sitting under a grey Scottish sky enjoying an ale or two, looking at the Wanganui label on the bottles and imagining being in beautiful New Zealand.
A few more beers and they'd probably rush to the travel agent and book a flight to Wanganui, NZ.
DOUG PRICE
Castlecliff
End of Life Choice Bill
It is interesting that Parliament's Justice Committee could not agree on "many substantial issues" in the End of Life Choice Bill, and stated that the bill "is not workable". The select committee was unable to agree on any substantive changes to the bill which would legalise euthanasia.
Yet Jay Kuten disregards this in his very regular articles heralding its so-called benefits. How can this be good for New Zealand?
JOAN SULLIVAN
Whanganui
Euthanasia message
When any person approves of euthanasia or assisted suicide like Bob Walker or Ann David in today's Chronicle (May 9) they should attempt to realise they send a message to their family members and close friends, suicide is okay.
When someone is in supposed difficulties so unrelenting suicide is contemplated, that person doesn't consider niceties such as euphemism to lock the closet, that person says "Mum and David say suicide is my right."
Same thing happens when parents tell their children a half-lie is fine. Stealing something worth $5 from the local shop is not a large amount. What's the message? Lying and stealing are not big problems.
F.R. HALPIN
Whanganui
Separate matters
Bob Walker began a letter to the Chronicle speaking about the End of Life Choice Bill and finished it speaking about putting "Do not resuscitate" on a hospital form. Now I do not know if Mr Walker was unintentionally confusing the two issues, or simply trying to fit two different things into the one letter, but they are two separate matters.
The bill is not about a patient refusing unnecessarily burdensome or unwanted medical treatment. It is about the direct and deliberate killing of the patient or giving the patient something to kill themselves with. As Mr Walker was apparently trying to say, a patient in New Zealand already has the right and ability to refuse medical treatment they do not want. Even 40 years ago my father-in-law was able to refuse medical treatment and face death as he chose.
The confusion around this bill is worrying, especially when it is being proposed that it could face a national referendum, and it is not helped by the confusion in some of the writings of proponents of the bill.
Another example is Ann David's letter that ends with "good assisted dying law is good suicide prevention." Think that one through. "Good assisted dying law", by which she means a law allowing euthanasia (killing of the patient) and assisted suicide (helping the patient kill themselves), "is good suicide prevention."
I am reminded of what George Orwell taught about the use of language in his novel 1984, where words were used to promote their opposites.
K.A. BENFELL
Gonville
Send your letters to: Letters, Whanganui Chronicle, 100 Guyton St, PO Box 433, Whanganui 4500; or email letters@wanganuichronicle.co.nz