I don't know what Police Minister Michael Woodhouse found confusing about the zero tolerance on speeding campaign. When police commissioner Mike Bush announced they would enforce the speed limit over summer to reduce fatalities, it's a pretty clear message that drivers could get pinged if they went over 100km/h.
Woodhouse has asked for a review of the public messages police issued on road safety, and says the zero tolerance campaign created confusion in the minds of the public.
Obviously, police still had discretion when it came to ticketing drivers - only 13 tickets were issued nationwide during the Christmas holiday period for drivers 1-4km over the speed limit. Speed cameras allowed a 4km discretion and that appeared to be the bit that some people found confusing. But, really, the message was clear. Slow down.
You can't blame police for wanting to repeat the zero tolerance campaign, given the success of the previous summer. I can't imagine how ghastly it must be to have to knock on someone's door to tell them their husband, brother, daughter or mother will never come home again.
I don't for one second believe zero tolerance is about revenue gathering. How can we possibly criticise the police for enforcing an existing law? Yes, it would be nice to think police are willing to use discretion. If you roared up to 110km/h in a passing lane to overtake a driver pulling a caravan, you would hope a sensible officer would avert his or her eyes. But if they didn't, surely you have only yourself to blame?