This helped Joyce in his efforts to downplay the report's significance. John Key tried to do the same before the report's release. But that might have backfired as the report's significance was a lot larger than he was suggesting it was.
The next time he says he is not losing any sleep over something, no one is going to believe him. Joyce has played a more clever, if more cynical game. He has been highly selective in emphasising some facets of the report ahead of others.
He has feigned ignorance of those elements that don't suit his case; he has deliberately sown confusion as to what the report actually says.
Joyce has gone out of his way to avoid even acknowledging, let alone accepting some of Smith's criticisms, particularly those concerning the lack of fairness and transparency in the crucial "expression of interest" phase of the selection process.
This was vividly illustrated in Parliament on Thursday afternoon when Joyce exasperated Russel Norman by accusing the Greens' co-leader of putting up straw men by mentioning that of the five options put up by the various would-be bidders, only SkyCity had been aware that the Government was unwilling to commit any money to the project by way of capital funding.
Joyce said he had not seen any such suggestion, prompting Norman to ask if Phillippa Smith had been creating a straw man when she had said "one potential submitter (SkyCity) had a clearer understanding of the actual position on a critical issue and that critical issue was the issue of whether the Government was going to provide any funding for capital costs".
Joyce suddenly recovered his memory, saying while Smith night have said that was a flaw in the process, she had also declared it might not have had significant consequences.
This kind of game-playing is unworthy of someone of Joyce's intelligence and stature. But it indicates the extent to which the report had National on the defensive.
Rather than treating the public's watchdog on the spending of public money with respect and take some remedial action, Joyce has treated an officer of Parliament almost with disdain.
That is behaviour which is constitutionally unacceptable coming from a Cabinet minister, especially given the lack of curbs on ministerial power in the New Zealand political system.
That still leaves the question of why officials were so helpful in tailoring the SkyCity bid so that it had the best chance of success.
The answer as far as Opposition parties are concerned resides within National's "cronyism" - a word that Labour, Green and NZ First MPs have been exercising their larynxes with this week under parliamentary privilege.
Phillippa Smith's report mentions a host of meetings and dinners variously involving SkyCity executives and board members, the Prime Minister, his chief of staff and other Cabinet ministers and their advisers.
Such were the number of these contacts that Gerry Brownlee - according to the report - declared at one point that "too many people are talking to SkyCity".
The Deputy Auditor-General's report stresses that there was no evidence the final decision to negotiate with SkyCity was influenced by any "inappropriate considerations" such as connections between politicians and business figures.
But Opposition parties argue Smith's report shows officials were simply doing what they thought their political masters expected of them.
Intentionally or unintentionally, Key had given indications - his ambiguous briefing note comment about "closing off the SkyCity angle" being the most obvious - that he wanted SkyCity on board. The officials duly delivered.
Moreover, Opposition MPs argue, the only time things have gone so badly askew with this kind of Government procurement has been during Key's tenure of the Beehive.
It must be stressed that there is no evidence of such political interference. And so far since the report's release last Tuesday, Opposition MPs have made little headway in terms of finding gaps or contradictions in Key's version of events.
In the wake of the report's release, Joyce and the Prime Minister have hammered two things in particular: first, that Smith found no evidence of "inappropriate considerations"; and second, that while acknowledging there might have been procedural failings, these made no substantive difference to the outcome.
Proper procedure is vital, however. As Smith's report notes, proper procedures provide transparency and fairness and avoid allegations of favouritism.
In contrast, the Ministry of Economic Development was lax in its planning on how to handle what should have been a normal competitive tender. Smith disappointed Opposition parties by not recommending that the pending resumption of negotiations between the Government and SkyCity be halted for good and everyone go back to square one and run a fair and transparent tender.
Even if she had, it is hard to see National agreeing. The convention centre has become one measure of Key's and National's capacity to get things done. If a further halt was called now, little progress would have been made before next year's election.
Key and National have simply invested too much political capital for the scheme to be further delayed.
The governing party will instead tough it out, continuing to argue black is white if necessary.
If it is any consolation for National, it has been a hectic week in politics.
There have been announcements covering Christchurch school closures and mergers, likewise on cigarette packaging, new steps to combat welfare fraud, and Solid Energy's parlous finances. The impact of the SkyCity report in voters' minds may accordingly be much less less than was predicted.
The Opposition may have to rethink how much time and resources it continues to devote to pillorying National with it.
