It adds to this Government’s focus on heavy enforcement of gangs alongside its proposed ban on gang patches worn in public and non-consorting orders.
It also contributes to changes in the approach to firearms with the Arms Act set to be assessed and then the potential for military-style weapons, like those used in the March 15 terror attacks, to be allowed for competition.
The bill changes legislation brought in under Labour. A Firearms Prohibition Order (FPO) prohibited anyone convicted of firearms-related crimes and other specific crimes, including murder and serious violence offences, from accessing or using guns.
“We don’t know how many people will be added to the system but I expect it to be more.
“I’ve already sought advice from the Crown Law who have said that what we are doing is neither a new punishment nor a new penalty.
“We’ve got to make sure that we have a regime that’s fit to purpose.”
McKee denied the amendment was an overreach on the bill of rights.
On criticism of the police’s “gang list” and how it would be used under this amendment, McKee said it wasn’t just about gangs but also criminal associates.
“But at the end of the day, it doesn’t matter about the list, it’s about people that commit the crimes, that’s primarily gang members and their associates.
“The reality about this is those on the FPO list do come from gangs.”
McKee said she was expanding the regime, so more people can be held accountable for committing crimes with guns through the FPO.
Police would also have more search rights.
“We are lowering the threshold.”
McKee said there was a specific focus on gangs in the proposed legislation, which would allow courts to issue an FPO to any member or associate of a gang who has been convicted of any drug, firearms or violent offence.
It is understood defining who was a gang member or associate would be done using the National Gang List, which has been criticised for not being an accurate method of determining gang membership.
Police would also be granted new powers to search offenders with an FPO, their vehicles, and their premises for firearms at any time.
The existing FPO legislation gave judges the ability to impose an order for up to 10 years, with any breaches potentially leading to jail time.
“The new legislation gives a judge the power to impose an order lasting 10 years and makes it a criminal offence to breach the conditions of the order. A breach is an imprisonable offence,” the statement said.
McKee said her bill would include the possibility of the FPO being “varied, modified or revoked” after five years.
“If someone can demonstrate that they no longer pose a risk to public safety, then they should be treated as such, but if they continue with their antisocial behaviour and put others in harm then it is in the public’s interest to make sure they can’t get their hands on more illegal firearms.”
McKee is also in charge of the rewrite of the Arms Act, something agreed to in the coalition deal between National and Act.
RNZ reported McKee said everything was on the table with respect to the rewrite, including allowing the return of semi-automatics being used for competition - that was outlawed following the deadly terror attack in Christchurch in 2019.
McKee has also been a vocal supporter of the gang patch ban proposed by the Government. The Opposition claims it would be impossible to enforce and would put police officers in danger.
In select committee yesterday, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith accepted the ban’s implementation would be a challenge but said that shouldn’t be a reason not to try to reduce the gangs’ public intimidation.
Adam Pearse is a political reporter in the NZ Herald Press Gallery team, based at Parliament. He has worked for NZME since 2018, covering sport and health for the Northern Advocate in Whangārei before moving to the NZ Herald in Auckland, covering Covid-19 and crime.