There is nothing new about bullying. Years ago, it took the form of an odd punch or verbal attack, usually in the school playground. If it was far from harmless, it was hardly of cancerous proportion. The rise of social media has changed all that, creating a bigger and more frightening platform for bullies and enhancing the prospects of a deadly outcome.
Sadly, some of this country's young have eagerly grasped the possibilities, while not eschewing more traditional forms of bullying. The upshot according to one survey of 9-year-olds in 35 countries is that three-quarters of New Zealand students suffered a form of bullying in the previous month, a figure higher than any other nation except Tunisia.
That finding provided the relevant context for this week's Herald series on bullying. In itself, it suggested this country's response to the problem has been inadequate. As much was confirmed by articles which found, for example, that New Zealand schools have been laxer than their Australian counterparts in developing specific anti-bullying policies.
It fell to Ombudsman David McGee, in a report last year on bullying at Hutt Valley High School, to state the obvious; that it should be compulsory for every school to implement such a programme.
The existence of these will not, in themselves, be a guarantee a school is dealing effectively with bullying. Many policies are undoubtedly full of platitudes about bullying being utterly unacceptable and pupils being empowered to talk to their teachers or the principal.