One of the problems with world-leading legislation is that it can open a Pandora's box. So it is with Peter Dunne's plan for a government-approved legal-high industry.
The Associate Health Minister's new regime for party pills and fake cannabis, due to be in place in about a year, will require makers to prove their products are "low risk" before they can be put on the market. The complication lies in exactly how that level of safety will be defined, and whether it should be aligned with existing recreational drugs, most notably alcohol.
The Ministry of Health's initial impulse seems to be that such a link would be untenable because of the substantial harm that alcohol can cause. Products such as Kronic would have to be proven to be less damaging.
But setting the bar for approval in that manner would inevitably attract well-merited accusations of hypocrisy. It would place alcohol, the recreational drug of choice for most adults, on a pedestal. Party pills and fake cannabis, which are more popular with youth, would not have its advantages even though they caused less harm.
According to the Ministry of Health, it would be a "hard sell" to align the safety tolerance factor for these drugs with alcohol. That reflects the historic role of alcohol as the drug of choice down through the centuries and the fact that for much of that time, society has chosen to minimise the damage it causes. It has never been linked with other drugs.