This is a transcript of the Premium Politics newsletter. To sign up, click here, select ‘Inside Politics with Audrey Young’ and save your preferences. For a step-by-step guide, click here.
Welcome to Inside Politics. The focus on David Seymour’s antics this week has diverted attention away from the most worrying diplomatic crisis Winston Peters has dealt with in his three stints as New Zealand’s Foreign Minister.
The terse public exchange of words between Peters and Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown goes nowhere near expressing the deep anxiety of the New Zealand Government about Brown’s lack of consultation over its comprehensive strategic partnership with China – currently being finalised in Beijing.
Of all the countries in the Pacific, of all the leaders in the Pacific, Mark Brown and the Cook Islands are the last ones they would anticipate going rogue on New Zealand.
It cuts even deeper because of Peters' affection for the Cooks, and his deep commitment to good relationships in the Pacific, illustrated by his extensive travel in the region. It must feel like a slap in the face for Peters – especially as a politician whose China radar is never off.
It is no secret that China wants a safe harbour/harbours in the Pacific for its vastly expanding naval fleet. It will not come in the form of a formal agreement but in future expansions of friendly agreements of maritime cooperation with smaller states. There have been scares over Vanuatu, Papua New Guinea and the Solomon Islands. No one anticipated it could potentially happen just beyond New Zealand’s front yard.
Brown has said there is no need for New Zealand to be in the room in Beijing. But New Zealand was not asking to be in the room in Beijing; it was asking to be properly consulted on the actual agreement before it was signed.
It was not asking for an unreasonable favour. New Zealand is responsible for the Cook Islands' external relations and defence. It says so in the Cook Islands Constitution Act 1964 and was reiterated in the 2001 Joint Centenary Declaration.
Brown has said there would be “no surprises” on security issues when the agreement was revealed after signing. If that is the case – if it is only about getting help to mine cobalt nodules on its ocean floor – what was there to lose in consulting New Zealand properly when the alternative is damaging its closest relationship?
Brown has been a very energetic PM and gained even more confidence when he chaired the Pacific Islands Forum last year. He was clearly upset last year when New Zealand flatly rejected his bid for a Cook Islands passport without forfeiting New Zealand citizenship. But the stakes are way higher now. It is easy enough to find academics who will say New Zealand is being a bully or being paternalistic. But New Zealand’s interests are clearly at stake, too. It is not an overreaction.
It is not always easy to identify who should get the brickbat each week (see below). Sometimes there are too many to choose from. Occasionally too many MPs have been exceptionally well-behaved. This week the problem is not who to choose – David Seymour, naturally – but that there are too many reasons to choose from.
It could be: a) because he wrote a letter to the police complaining about their treatment of his constituent Philip Polkinghorne when he was a murder suspect following his wife’s suspicious death; b) because he called the Prime Minister “ill-advised” after Christopher Luxon had called his letter “ill-advised”; c) for driving a Land Rover up the steps of Parliament; d) for suggesting MPs should not need permission if it is a good cause; e) for saying the security guard who stopped him had put himself in danger; f) for giving a Clayton’s apology to the Speaker, if he took offence; g) for telling reporters he didn’t know he wasn’t allowed to drive up the steps when 1News had footage of him being told beforehand he wasn’t allowed.
Would it be so hard to say: “With the benefit of hindsight, perhaps I shouldn’t have done it”?
Government ministers remain strongly on message over their growth agenda, but have struggled to get oxygen for it this week.
Luxon and Immigration Minister Erica Stanford announced revamped visas on Sunday to attract wealthy investors to the country, including dropping an English language test. Luxon then brought Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop to his post-Cabinet press conference to talk about an investment summit being planned for March. And Finance Minister Nicola Willis foreshadowed further work on supermarket competition policy in a speech to Waikato University’s Economic Forum.
But as Herald deputy political editor Thomas Coughlan pointed out in a comment piece on Monday, the coalition is struggling to get traction with the public. A third poll showed the current Coalition bloc behind the left bloc.
Coughlan makes the point that “given how hard National campaigned on fixing the economic mess it alleged Labour created when the facts were more mixed, it’s hard to feel too sorry for the party when voters take out their current economic angst upon it – despite National being equally as culpable or inculpable for this malaise as Labour”. He believes the Government’s polling will improve as the economy improves.
• Oops! Apologies to Governor-General Dame Cindy Kiro for suggesting in last week’s emailed version of Inside Politics that the Beehive bar was moving to her place, Government House. It is, of course, moving to Parliament House. That said, we think “Cindy’s” wouldn’t be a bad name for the as-yet-unnamed bar.
• There are apparently some advantages to losing. Labour list MP Jo Luxton lost her Rangitata seat (near Timaru) to National’s James Meager in 2023. But now, unencumbered by constituents, she and her husband have decided to move back to the place she used to call home, Gisborne, and she may stand there next year.
• A delegation of eight parliamentarians from Mongolia was cordially welcomed by MPs to Question Time yesterday, accompanied by Mongolia’s Honorary Consul in New Zealand, none other than Herald columnist and lobbyist Matthew Hooton.
“Does the public have the right to know what’s happening in every cowshed tonight?” Minister for Oceans and Fisheries Shane Jones explains why he doesn’t think the footage of cameras on fishing boats should be subject to the Official Information Act.
What iwi has taken a case to the High Court this week to seek recognition of what it calls “rangatiratanga entitlement” over fresh water in its tribal area (takiwā)? (Answer below.)
David Seymour, of course (see above).
The security guard who ordered David Seymour to stop driving up the steps of Parliament. Firm but fair.
OPINION – polls: Voters have delivered a grim Valentine’s message to PM Christopher Luxon, writes Thomas Coughlan – we’re just not that into you.
Water rights: In an unprecedented case, Ngāi Tahu is suing the Crown in a bid to share control of water management in its tribal area.
Polkinghorne letter: Act leader David Seymour has hit back at PM Christopher Luxon’s description of his letter to police advocating for former murder suspect Philip Polkinghorne as “ill-advised”.
OPINION – Polkinghorne letter: It might be time for Christopher Luxon and David Seymour to take a few deep breaths before their increasingly prickly relationship moves further into open warfare territory, writes Claire Trevett.
OPINION – Polkinghorne letter: David Seymour was extremely unwise in writing a letter to the police about their conduct during their investigation of Philip Polkinghorne, writes Audrey Young.
Public service: Public Service Minister Judith Collins has told public service leaders to show respect to taxpayers in their communications.
Immigration changes: The Government is relaxing immigration settings to try to attract wealthy foreign investors.
Quiz answer: Ngāi Tahu
For more political news and views, listen to On the Tiles, the Herald’s politics podcast.
NZ First's Shane Jones added that he didn’t think Ferris was remorseful.